Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Parent Trigger: Too Much Firepower for Public Education?

There's a significant buzz out of Florida regarding proposed legislation that would enact a so-called "Parent Trigger:" Dissatisfied families could vote to have a local public school undergo significant restructuring including being converted to a charter school or turned over to a private operator.

Similar legislation has passed in California and Texas, not without controversy and ensuing conflict, and Indiana is also considering enacting a parent trigger.

Here's part of the problem: There's no clear picture of what happens once the trigger is pulled or much hard evidence that the students would ultimately benefit from the intervention.

Florida is ranked third in the nation for its charter school laws, according to the latest report from the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. Among the elements that earned the Sunshine State high marks is its lack of a cap on the number of charter schools permitted. Florida also allows state universities and community college boards to authorize specific types of charter schools, opening up additional avenues beyond the local school board.

Charter schools were always supposed to be the Next Great Idea in public education, allowing seeds of innovation to flourish without the perceived distractions attributed to collective bargaining agreements and district regulations. The idea was that with charter schools blazing the trail, public schools could follow.

But when well-meaning parents and community groups launched some of these independently operated schools, what they quickly discovered is that the business of education is more difficult than they had ever envisioned.

Into that wide breech stepped education management organizations, often promising the moon plus a rocketship to get there. The moon has yet to be delivered. Or even the rocketship, really. There are certainly examples of strong charter schools. But there are significant gains still to be made. (For more on how for-profit and nonprofit-managed charter schools are performing compared with traditional public schools, click here. The Hechinger Report, via Time magazine, also has an excellent story on what happens when charters are forced to close.)

In California, actual attempts to pull the parent trigger appear mostly to have fired blanks. A Compton public school was the first to test the new law and survey parents about what they wanted to happen to a struggling campus. What resulted, according to an editorial from the Los Angeles Times, was the "stuff of high educational drama — claims of intimidation from both sides, an intransigent school board that put parents through ridiculous hoops to verify their signatures and, eventually, legal defeat when the petition was found lacking on largely technical grounds."

The editorial board at the Sun Sentinel has significant reservations about Florida's proposed legislation, warning that "private education companies could chum the waters in beleaguered districts with political campaigns to tilt parents toward privatization." The editorial also raises concerns that parents who are "often too busy even for PTA meetings would face a steep and brief learning curve in making such a game-changing call."

Florida lawmakers are considering additional legislation that targets some of the concerns outlined in the Sun Sentinel's editorial. (Click here for the Orlando Sentinel's story.) A proposed law would  require schools to issue report cards for parents of students in grades K-3, grading them on the quality of their participation in their children's schooling.

How active are the parents in your schools? Are any of them clamoring for more involvement in the educational programs and models that are implemented their communities’ schools? Have education management organizations been holding community meetings in your area to make themselves better known to parents? What's the most successful charter school in your town, and is it a model that could be replicated at a lower-achieving campus?

Have a question, comment or concern for the Educated Reporter? Email EWA public editor Emily Richmond at erichmond@ewa.org. She also tweets @EWAEmily.

Labels: , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Florida PTA and several other grassroots parents' organization oppose the parent trigger bill as one more pretext for defunding public education, one more pretext for building privatization and quasi-privatization, and one more way to keep harmful political narratives going--a privatization narrative that has no empirical basis for endorsement.

February 1, 2012 at 10:06 AM  
Blogger caroline said...

It's interesting that editorial boards all up and down California enthusiastically endorsed the Parent Trigger (actually, "belligerently" is a more apt adjective, as there's a huge amount of teacher-bashing incorporated in the concept). But in Florida, both the Orlando and Palm Beach papers have raised sharp questions about it. Is the Florida press just much sharper and less gullible than the California press, or did the PR tide turn? Discuss among yourselves. (I know this comment is about editorial boards, not education writers.)

Parent Revolution is the California organization that created the Parent Trigger. Parent Revolution was founded by charter school operator Steve Barr and is funded by the Gates-Broad-Walton usual suspects. So in Florida, a Parent Revolution employee reportedly appeared before the legislature and told the officials that she and "two other moms" had founded Parent Revolution. This is the kind of lie that the press has been known to love to expose, and it sure would be heartening to see that happen. (The MSM HAS been having a ball with the paid fake protesters hired by the corporate education reform sector to carry signs supporting closing schools in Chicago. It's endless fun to ask them why they're protesting as they get off the bus outside the public hearing, and film them as they duck and stammer. Let's see more reporting on corporate-ed-reform scams, MSM! They're low-hanging fruit, there for the plucking.)

February 1, 2012 at 11:27 PM  
Anonymous Feifan Chang said...

Good informative & helping one post defined .
Thanks for sharing the info...

February 2, 2012 at 6:43 AM  

Post a Comment

Considerate comments are welcome. Uncivil remarks will be deleted. Anonymous comments -- including those unaccompanied by the author's first and last name -- are not permitted.

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home